Comparison of Hypertrophy

Hypertrophy is the process by which skeletal muscle fibers increase in size in response to resistance training. However, muscle growth is not a single, uniform adaptation. Different training stimuli emphasize different structural and functional changes within muscle tissue. The two most commonly discussed forms are myofibrillar hypertrophy and sarcoplasmic hypertrophy. Understanding their differences helps athletes, coaches, and lifters design more effective and goal-specific training programs.Unlike hypertrophy adaptations that primarily improve force production, sarcoplasmic hypertrophy mainly increases muscle size, fullness, and visual density. This adaptation is strongly associated with traditional bodybuilding training and plays a major role in aesthetic muscle development.

Overview of the Two Main Hypertrophy Types

While all hypertrophy involves muscle fiber enlargement, the primary tissue affected differs depending on training emphasis.

  • Myofibrillar hypertrophy increases the size and density of contractile proteins

  • Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy increases the volume of non-contractile cellular components

Both adaptations occur together, but training variables can shift the balance between them.

Structural Differences

Myofibrillar Hypertrophy

Myofibrillar hypertrophy is characterized by an increase in the number and thickness of myofibrils within muscle fibers.
These myofibrils are composed of actin and myosin filaments, which are directly responsible for force production.

Primary structural outcomes:

  • Increased contractile protein density

  • Higher force output per unit of muscle size

  • Improved neuromuscular efficiency

This adaptation enhances functional strength and mechanical performance.

Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy

Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy involves an expansion of the sarcoplasm, the fluid matrix surrounding myofibrils.

This includes increases in:

  • Glycogen and water storage

  • Metabolic enzymes

  • Mitochondria

  • Intracellular fluid

Primary structural outcomes:

  • Larger muscle cross-sectional area

  • Increased muscle fullness and visual size

  • Greater metabolic capacity

This adaptation emphasizes muscle volume and aesthetics rather than maximal force.

Training Stimuli and Adaptation Drivers

Mechanical Tension vs Metabolic Stress

The dominant stimulus differs between hypertrophy types:

  • Myofibrillar hypertrophy is driven primarily by high mechanical tension

  • Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is driven primarily by metabolic stress and volume accumulation

Mechanical tension promotes structural reinforcement of contractile tissue, while metabolic stress promotes cellular expansion and substrate storage.

Typical Training Characteristics

Myofibrillar-Focused Training

  • Heavier loads (generally >70% 1RM)

  • Lower to moderate repetition ranges

  • Longer rest periods

  • Emphasis on progressive overload

Common in strength-oriented programs and athletic performance training.

Sarcoplasmic-Focused Training

  • Moderate loads (approximately 60–75% 1RM)

  • Moderate to high repetition ranges

  • Shorter rest periods

  • Higher total training volume

Common in bodybuilding and physique-focused training.

Strength vs Size Outcomes

A common misconception is that one form of hypertrophy produces “real muscle” while the other does not.
In reality, both adaptations contribute to muscle growth, but with different outcomes.

  • Myofibrillar hypertrophy improves strength-to-size ratio

  • Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy improves visual muscle size and endurance

Athletes requiring maximal force output prioritize myofibrillar adaptations, while physique athletes often emphasize sarcoplasmic adaptations.

Can You Separate Hypertrophy Types?

Complete separation is biologically unrealistic.

Muscle fibers adapt globally, meaning:

  • High-volume training still stimulates myofibrillar growth

  • Heavy training still produces some sarcoplasmic expansion

However, training emphasis can influence the dominant adaptation over time.

Well-designed programs often periodize training to include phases that emphasize each adaptation.

Long-Term Muscle Development

From a long-term perspective, both forms of hypertrophy are complementary.

Myofibrillar hypertrophy increases the muscle’s ability to handle heavier loads.
Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy increases the muscle’s ability to tolerate higher volumes.

Together, they create a foundation for sustainable hypertrophy progression.

Evidence-Based Summary

  • Hypertrophy is not a single adaptation but a spectrum of structural changes

  • Myofibrillar hypertrophy prioritizes contractile protein growth and strength

  • Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy prioritizes cellular volume and muscle size

  • Both adaptations occur simultaneously but can be emphasized through training variables

  • Balanced programs leverage both for optimal muscle development

Related Pages

  • Myofibrillar Hypertrophy

  • Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy

  • Training for Hypertrophy

  • Training Volume for Hypertrophy

  • Training Intensity for Hypertrophy

Scroll to Top